The Venetian Institute aims to provide solutions based on the principles of individual liberty, institutional integrity, free enterprise, limited government and commonwealth
The Venetian Institute aims to provide solutions based on the principles of individual liberty, institutional integrity, free enterprise, limited government and commonwealth Venetian Institute - Symbol: Winged Lion Venetian Institute: Individual Liberty, Institutional Integrity, Free Enterprise, Limited Government, Commonwealth   Venetian Institute - Motto: Pro Bono Publico
Home Our Mission Support Us Contact Us   Help Italiano
    Publications    Articles    Conference Papers    Booklets    Books    Authors
 
About Us
Projects
Publications
Grants
 
Miscellanea
 
Support Us
Contact Us
 
 
 
Adopting the AVF Model -
Does this Choice Result in a Reduction in Military Expenditure?

by Giampietro Lea (Venetian Institute) -


 

Abstract.
With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union, an increasing number of European countries decided to abolish compulsory military service and move towards All Volunteer Forces (AVF). Using data obtained from SIPRI, for the period 1988-2009, this paper analyses whether the move from conscription to volunteers resulted in a reduction in the military expenditure of those countries which adopted the AVF model. Results of the analysis show that most European countries achieved a reduction in military expenditure in the period under study whether or not they had abolished conscription. The reduction in expenditure appears to be a long-term trend triggered by the end of the Cold War.


Due to the high number of graphs and statistical analyses, the main body of this research paper is best viewed in paper format. Please proceed to download the PDF version.


Conclusions and Further Study

The analyses carried out (time series, t-tests, correlation) have shown that although there has been a reduction in military expenditure, in the period 1988-2009, this reduction cannot - in general - be ascribed to the AVF versus Conscription choice.

The time-series graphs reveal clearly that reduction in expenditure is common to both countries which moved to the AVF model (or which already had it) and those which have decided to retain conscription. The correlation analyses further confirm the lack of correlation between change in expenditure and abolition of conscription.

Although there are some localized regional exceptions (Caucasus, Aegean and Baltic countries) the reduction in military expenditure seems to be a long-term trend triggered by the end of the Cold War, and with no apparent link to the abolition of conscription. This downward trend appears now to have stabilised.
Expenditure for France, UK and Turkey is now (2009) at approximately 2.5% of GDP. Italy, Germany, Poland fluctuate between 1.5% and 2% of GDP, while the remaining smaller countries (with some exceptions - as mentioned) hover around the 1% mark.

Due to time constraints, it has not been possible to carry out any initial - though superficial given the complexity of the area - formulation of a possible predictor model for military expenditure. This model would need to take into account not only the non-stationarity of the data and the dependence between yt and yt-n, but also the many independent (xi) non-financial variables, such as: 1) size of the country, 2) local unemployment rates, 3) ratio of Volunteers' wages to "equivalent" market wages, 4) availability of job opportunities alternative to a career in the Armed Forces, 5) draftees' deferment rates, or uses in non-military roles, 6) conscripts' wages, 7) ratio of personnel costs to equipment/infrastructure costs, 8) external threats, etc.

Finally, this initial analysis has raised several questions regarding some particular countries' military expenditure, e.g. Greece and Armenia. It would be interesting to carry out a detailed disaggregated analysis of their expenditure along the lines used by Bove and Cavatorta (2010) in order to understand what Armenia's aims are, or how Greece will manage to keep such high levels of MilEx (3.2%) given its current dire economic situation.


References

  • Aaviksoo, J., (2010) Estonian Mandatory Conscription Here to Stay, Baltic Report, (http://balticreports.com/?p=21416)
  • Bove, V. and Cavatorta, E. (2010) From Conscription to Volunteers: Budget Shares in NATO Defence Spending, Birkbeck College, London
  • CIA World Fact Book, (2011) https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook.html
  • Dunne, J.P., Alonso, M.G., Levine, P. and Smith, R.P. (2005) The Evolution of the International Arms Industry.
  • Knorr, K. (1985) Burden-sharing in NATO, Orbis 29:517-536.
  • Oneal, J. R. (1991) The Monetary Value of Conscription, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
  • Poutvaara, P. and Wagener, A. (2009) The Political Economy of Conscription, Discussion Paper
  • SIPRI Military Expenditure Database (2011) http://www.sipri.org

Download the Article in PDF Format

If you do not have the required "Adobe Reader" you can download it for free from the Adobe.com website by clicking on the following icon:

Get Adobe Reader


(*) For the purpose of the Institute's work, the words "Venices", "Venetia" and "Northeast Italy" are interchangeable, and are taken as meaning the historical Venices within Northern Italy - i.e. the current italian regions of Venezia Tridentina-Sud Tirol/Alto Adige, Venezia Euganea, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, the current provinces of Bergamo, Brescia, Cremona (i.e Venezia Orobica), and Mantua.